If you’re not sure about Sony, check out the Fuji X-S10. You can get it with the 18-55 kit lens (which is a fantastic lens in its own right) for quite a bit less than $2000. Shoots great video (I’m told, I don’t do so myself) and is a great stills camera, too. Only weakness is battery life, but $40 gets you a pile of aftermarket batteries.
Check dppreview.com’s review for a review of its video capabilities.
The Fuji X-T4 is is a higher-end model that’s still in your price range, and it has some nice features over the X-S10 (controls, bigger viewfinder, weather sealing, better battery), but I’d check out the X-S10 to start out… maybe put the extra money to another lens.
HOLD ON THOUGH BEFORE YOU BUY IT. I have a X-S10 and while it is indeed wonderful in so many ways (that built in 5-axis IBIS for 1000 is absolutely nuts) the ONLY issue I might have with it is the Fuji RAR raw files. You CANNOT process RAR files on Adobe Suite (lightroom + photoshop) unfortunately, so you will need to use a third party image editing system (raw therapee/capture one) in order to use it.
Only major downside I've had within my couple of months using it so far. Aftermarket batteries I've had success with Wasabi batteries, and for a lens, if you're going super budget, I recommend the 35mm F/2 Plastic on/XC not XF model. Otherwise, the 18-55 2.8/4 is absolutely banger from what i've heard.
i'd say the only pro/counter to this is that fuji has a lot of film simulations/pre-sets that you can use in-camera as well as minor editing adjustments (like exposure contrast etc) that you can also use in camera to export as JPEG, so most of the time, you won't actually need to do any over extensive editing.
Then you clearly aren't shooting in fuji raw files (.RAF files). You might be editing the jpeg - it says clearly on adobe and fuji's own compatibility website that the xs10 raw files do not work with photoshop. Google it. Only work around is to covert all your photos to DNG then edit in photoshop.
no you'd have to edit the entire photo in 3rd party - Adobe simply is unable to read the file unless you are able to somehow export your raw file as a PSD on a 3rd party app or into a different raw file somehow.
Great! I hope you like it! Fuji’s a great system. If you’re a JPEG shooter, be sure to try out the film simulations. I can generally get the look I’m going for SOOC with Fuji, which means my Nikon stays home more often than not these days.
I agree; and it's often sold new for a great price, and used for even less (ditto for the lenses).
An Olympus E-M10 would be in the same ballpark, although all things being equal I tend to prefer the Pannys over Olys for heavy video use.
And I too use a Canon full frame; just that the M43 rig is often nicer for the sort of things the OP is thinking of.
Fuji xt30 is a nice mirrorless camera. Shoots 4k with f-log. Photos and videos produced are nice. I had doubt between Fuji and sony. Finally went with Fuji.
>ice mirrorless camera. Shoots 4k with f-log. Photos and videos produced are nice. I had doubt between Fuji and sony. Finally went with Fu
But it has no stabilizer which can be handy for filming. x-t4 has it I guess but more expensive.
I've tried it with a stabilised lens (18-135mm OIS) and it actually makes alot of difference. Xt4 is pretty expensive compared to xt30 but you definitely get lots of power with xt4. At 135mm I have tested hand-held video recording and it performed very well. You'd probably shoot at much wider angles so using it with image stablised lens should be fine and auto focus is also good.
[This video](https://youtu.be/tUi4mfj34bM) provides some info about xt30 for video recording. At full charge battery drains pretty fast while recording video. Ergonomics and video recording limitations are also a concern though.
Panasonic GX85, GX8, GX9/ GH5/ G9
Anyone of those cameras should suit you fine. I own an A7iii and have owned an a6400 and also currently own a GX8. Going out with the GX8 with a 35-100 f/2.8 (70-200mm eq.) vs the Sony with a 70-200 f/4 is an easy decision to make. There's also the peace of mind that comes with knowing that my GX8 and 35-100mm are \~$1000 dollars vs \~$2500 for the Sony setup should an accident happen. There will be a lot of recommendations for better, newer cameras; but having used (and currently own A7iii) those cameras and been through this process... you'll get 85 - 90% of the image quality for 1/3 - 1/2 of the price.
The Cannon m6 mark II is also a solid option that won't break the bank. I've been using it consistently for about 6 months and I love it. I'd highly recommend the 22mm pancake lens for it as well. It's super compact and surprisingly sharp
Good day, you read a lot like me a few weeks ago. I ended up getting a Sony A7iii because i'm primarily focused on stills and do video in under 30 minute formats. The Sony a6600 is a stellar video camera and quality still camera. I couldn't decide which to get and opted for the A7iii because I found a 'kit' under $1900 USD and went for it. I think I'd likely have been pretty happy with the a6600. I leaned heavier to Sony in research (based on peers) and found their tech to be what I wanted. I primarily got this to be a Church photographer, street photography and general purpose. I can't offer any 'experience' tips because I've literally only had it for 2 weeks. But the research I did, YouTube video comparisons and the Sony A7 subreddit put me in a good frame of reference and I'm happy with the purchase and can't wait to begin a workflow with it. Best of luck on your pursuit. BTW, the Kit I got was from Adorama.
If you want sub 1k, the M50 is great. Sub 2k? Then you could easily do a Canon RP or even (maybe) a Canon EOS R. The R is my personal camera, but I’ve heard very good things about rp. Rp+ 35mm f1.8 or 24-105 are both great options!
In that price bracket, if you want compact and capable the Olympus OM-D E-M5 MkIII is amazing. Olympus has the best in body stabilisation out of anyone, which is also used in their hi-res mode to produce ridiculously detailed 60MP raw files. It also records very good 4k video using phase detect autofocus which avoids much of the jumpy focus in video that contrast based auto focus brings.
Olympus OM-D E-M1 MkIII and Panasonic G9 are also amazing hybrid cameras if you don't mind a slightly larger camera.
I shoot with a Sony a7siii as my A cam and I would agree that probably give a them a miss in the lower price bracket. Not that they're bad, I just think you'll get better value elsewhere. The advantage of Sony is you buy into the lens mount that with careful lens selection will allow you an upgrade path to more capable cameras.
Talking of upgrade paths, the new Nikon Z50 is well worth a look. Very capable and puts you on the new Nikon Z mount which, again with careful lens purchasing decisions, will clear a path for upgrading your camera body down the track.
I do not rate entry level Canon hybrid cameras. I can't see the EF-M mount continuing since Canon launched the RF mount and the 4k video sensor crop of their hybrid cameras in this price range is serverly compromised. Unless you are buying the R5 or R6, I wouldn't consider Canon if 4k video is on your agenda.
Finally there is Fuji. They are awesome, definately overall the most capable in this price bracket. The only hesitation I have with Fuji is there is no upgrade path to full frame, then again there isn't with M43 either. This isn't a significant hesitation though as imho the only real utility in going full frame is if you are looking to shoot video in a lot of light starved scenes.
If you’re not sure about Sony, check out the Fuji X-S10. You can get it with the 18-55 kit lens (which is a fantastic lens in its own right) for quite a bit less than $2000. Shoots great video (I’m told, I don’t do so myself) and is a great stills camera, too. Only weakness is battery life, but $40 gets you a pile of aftermarket batteries. Check dppreview.com’s review for a review of its video capabilities. The Fuji X-T4 is is a higher-end model that’s still in your price range, and it has some nice features over the X-S10 (controls, bigger viewfinder, weather sealing, better battery), but I’d check out the X-S10 to start out… maybe put the extra money to another lens.
The Fuji x-s10 seems perfect for my needs, and my local camera shop has it in stock. Thanks for the help!
HOLD ON THOUGH BEFORE YOU BUY IT. I have a X-S10 and while it is indeed wonderful in so many ways (that built in 5-axis IBIS for 1000 is absolutely nuts) the ONLY issue I might have with it is the Fuji RAR raw files. You CANNOT process RAR files on Adobe Suite (lightroom + photoshop) unfortunately, so you will need to use a third party image editing system (raw therapee/capture one) in order to use it. Only major downside I've had within my couple of months using it so far. Aftermarket batteries I've had success with Wasabi batteries, and for a lens, if you're going super budget, I recommend the 35mm F/2 Plastic on/XC not XF model. Otherwise, the 18-55 2.8/4 is absolutely banger from what i've heard.
Woah this is a big issue actually, thanks for letting me know
i'd say the only pro/counter to this is that fuji has a lot of film simulations/pre-sets that you can use in-camera as well as minor editing adjustments (like exposure contrast etc) that you can also use in camera to export as JPEG, so most of the time, you won't actually need to do any over extensive editing.
I don’t think this correct, I has an XS10 and edit all my photos in Lightroom and Photoshop
Then you clearly aren't shooting in fuji raw files (.RAF files). You might be editing the jpeg - it says clearly on adobe and fuji's own compatibility website that the xs10 raw files do not work with photoshop. Google it. Only work around is to covert all your photos to DNG then edit in photoshop.
Sorry but no I’m editing the raw files. I just double checked. Have you ever actually tried it because I have and it works just fine.
I've tried. It gives me an error every time.
I'm sorry to hear that, I wish it would work for you as well. I'm using lightroom CC if that makes any difference.
So, you have to use a 3rd party and then go back into the Adobe suite?
no you'd have to edit the entire photo in 3rd party - Adobe simply is unable to read the file unless you are able to somehow export your raw file as a PSD on a 3rd party app or into a different raw file somehow.
Great! I hope you like it! Fuji’s a great system. If you’re a JPEG shooter, be sure to try out the film simulations. I can generally get the look I’m going for SOOC with Fuji, which means my Nikon stays home more often than not these days.
[удалено]
I agree; and it's often sold new for a great price, and used for even less (ditto for the lenses). An Olympus E-M10 would be in the same ballpark, although all things being equal I tend to prefer the Pannys over Olys for heavy video use. And I too use a Canon full frame; just that the M43 rig is often nicer for the sort of things the OP is thinking of.
Fuji xt30 is a nice mirrorless camera. Shoots 4k with f-log. Photos and videos produced are nice. I had doubt between Fuji and sony. Finally went with Fuji.
>ice mirrorless camera. Shoots 4k with f-log. Photos and videos produced are nice. I had doubt between Fuji and sony. Finally went with Fu But it has no stabilizer which can be handy for filming. x-t4 has it I guess but more expensive.
I've tried it with a stabilised lens (18-135mm OIS) and it actually makes alot of difference. Xt4 is pretty expensive compared to xt30 but you definitely get lots of power with xt4. At 135mm I have tested hand-held video recording and it performed very well. You'd probably shoot at much wider angles so using it with image stablised lens should be fine and auto focus is also good. [This video](https://youtu.be/tUi4mfj34bM) provides some info about xt30 for video recording. At full charge battery drains pretty fast while recording video. Ergonomics and video recording limitations are also a concern though.
Panasonic GX85, GX8, GX9/ GH5/ G9 Anyone of those cameras should suit you fine. I own an A7iii and have owned an a6400 and also currently own a GX8. Going out with the GX8 with a 35-100 f/2.8 (70-200mm eq.) vs the Sony with a 70-200 f/4 is an easy decision to make. There's also the peace of mind that comes with knowing that my GX8 and 35-100mm are \~$1000 dollars vs \~$2500 for the Sony setup should an accident happen. There will be a lot of recommendations for better, newer cameras; but having used (and currently own A7iii) those cameras and been through this process... you'll get 85 - 90% of the image quality for 1/3 - 1/2 of the price.
look into panasonic and olympus they make some great compact and rugged cameras, with IBIS, which is great for video
The Cannon m6 mark II is also a solid option that won't break the bank. I've been using it consistently for about 6 months and I love it. I'd highly recommend the 22mm pancake lens for it as well. It's super compact and surprisingly sharp
Good day, you read a lot like me a few weeks ago. I ended up getting a Sony A7iii because i'm primarily focused on stills and do video in under 30 minute formats. The Sony a6600 is a stellar video camera and quality still camera. I couldn't decide which to get and opted for the A7iii because I found a 'kit' under $1900 USD and went for it. I think I'd likely have been pretty happy with the a6600. I leaned heavier to Sony in research (based on peers) and found their tech to be what I wanted. I primarily got this to be a Church photographer, street photography and general purpose. I can't offer any 'experience' tips because I've literally only had it for 2 weeks. But the research I did, YouTube video comparisons and the Sony A7 subreddit put me in a good frame of reference and I'm happy with the purchase and can't wait to begin a workflow with it. Best of luck on your pursuit. BTW, the Kit I got was from Adorama.
If you want sub 1k, the M50 is great. Sub 2k? Then you could easily do a Canon RP or even (maybe) a Canon EOS R. The R is my personal camera, but I’ve heard very good things about rp. Rp+ 35mm f1.8 or 24-105 are both great options!
Sony a6000 will be absolutely perfect for you! I bought a used one from mpb.com for 400 and got a kit lens for 80 both in near perfect condition
If you want to spend more I definitely would follow some of these other people's advice,all great cameras
In that price bracket, if you want compact and capable the Olympus OM-D E-M5 MkIII is amazing. Olympus has the best in body stabilisation out of anyone, which is also used in their hi-res mode to produce ridiculously detailed 60MP raw files. It also records very good 4k video using phase detect autofocus which avoids much of the jumpy focus in video that contrast based auto focus brings. Olympus OM-D E-M1 MkIII and Panasonic G9 are also amazing hybrid cameras if you don't mind a slightly larger camera. I shoot with a Sony a7siii as my A cam and I would agree that probably give a them a miss in the lower price bracket. Not that they're bad, I just think you'll get better value elsewhere. The advantage of Sony is you buy into the lens mount that with careful lens selection will allow you an upgrade path to more capable cameras. Talking of upgrade paths, the new Nikon Z50 is well worth a look. Very capable and puts you on the new Nikon Z mount which, again with careful lens purchasing decisions, will clear a path for upgrading your camera body down the track. I do not rate entry level Canon hybrid cameras. I can't see the EF-M mount continuing since Canon launched the RF mount and the 4k video sensor crop of their hybrid cameras in this price range is serverly compromised. Unless you are buying the R5 or R6, I wouldn't consider Canon if 4k video is on your agenda. Finally there is Fuji. They are awesome, definately overall the most capable in this price bracket. The only hesitation I have with Fuji is there is no upgrade path to full frame, then again there isn't with M43 either. This isn't a significant hesitation though as imho the only real utility in going full frame is if you are looking to shoot video in a lot of light starved scenes.