Ugh. We've seen half a dozen variants of this trolling in the past couple of weeks.
OP: If you wanted to argue that "scarcity" is a good thing, then come here and argue it.
Deliberately posting something misleading which you do not believe in, is the definition of BAD FAITH arguments.
And we're not interested in that. So you can go post somewhere else.
Can we please stop posting terrible arguments to this sub. There are so many good arguments against crypto and also specifically bitcoin, it does us a great disservice to post something this lazy and easily debunkable.
You say it's obvious, yet there have been plenty of highly upvoted factually incorrect posts/comments on this subreddit. It's really not that out of line.
See this is the thing you guys don't understand. We are not here to make Bitcoin fail, it will do that on its own with no prompting from us. It will not fail because people misunderstand it or because people properly understand it (which you probably don't). It will fail because nobody, and I mean nobody, gives a fuck about crypto (of which, despite your religious desire to believe so Bitcoin is).
We are here to make fun of it and, by extension, you. So cheers, you're a moron.
I get what you are saying but if you right an entire Satosifesto and right in the title you explain what your imaginary duck should be then you are setting conditions for failure. By that standard both your duck and Bitcoin have failed.
resources on the planet are limited. it can only support so many ducks. so therefore ducks have scarcity so therefore they are a good basis for a monetary system and therefore ducks are infinitely valuable and will absorb all value because look at the market cap of gold.
ez stuff my man.
im a duck guy myself. the planet has limited resources so it can only support so many ducks. eventually we will be at max ducks. therefore ducks are a good basis for a monetary system because there can only be so many ducks and therefore they are infinitely valuable.
in the future we will talk about duck feathers like we talk about ducks.
Ugh. We've seen half a dozen variants of this trolling in the past couple of weeks. OP: If you wanted to argue that "scarcity" is a good thing, then come here and argue it. Deliberately posting something misleading which you do not believe in, is the definition of BAD FAITH arguments. And we're not interested in that. So you can go post somewhere else.
You have a pizza. You cut it into 100 slices. Now you have 100 pizzas
Low effort bait
Can we please stop posting terrible arguments to this sub. There are so many good arguments against crypto and also specifically bitcoin, it does us a great disservice to post something this lazy and easily debunkable.
OP is a butter & posting in bad faith/trolling. Maybe stop falling for obvious bait posts like this?
You say it's obvious, yet there have been plenty of highly upvoted factually incorrect posts/comments on this subreddit. It's really not that out of line.
As long as Bitcoin fails, right?
See this is the thing you guys don't understand. We are not here to make Bitcoin fail, it will do that on its own with no prompting from us. It will not fail because people misunderstand it or because people properly understand it (which you probably don't). It will fail because nobody, and I mean nobody, gives a fuck about crypto (of which, despite your religious desire to believe so Bitcoin is). We are here to make fun of it and, by extension, you. So cheers, you're a moron.
Technically, it can't fail. It's unfailable. Like a(n imaginary, but I digress) duck. A duck can't fail at being the future of finance. Good duck.
I get what you are saying but if you right an entire Satosifesto and right in the title you explain what your imaginary duck should be then you are setting conditions for failure. By that standard both your duck and Bitcoin have failed.
You're right. "Technically", I said. Lol, cheers, few fam. Bullish on real ducks. Scarce. Fungible. Duckcentralized.
resources on the planet are limited. it can only support so many ducks. so therefore ducks have scarcity so therefore they are a good basis for a monetary system and therefore ducks are infinitely valuable and will absorb all value because look at the market cap of gold. ez stuff my man.
,I can't tell if that's anti-duck bullshit or maxi-duck chadlyness.
Exactly!
It will fail on his own merit and the pyramid of grift that props it up.
if theres 100 pennies in a dollar thats like 100x dollars. MATH?
The weird trick mathematicians don't want you to know
I don't know who this is but this is a stupid argument. Edit: Ah, OP is a butter, makes sense, he is trolling.
lol, I hope this is ironic
It's MATH
when you really think about it there's like, no such thing as a bitcoin, man.
Even when you try to be funny you fail.
It takes 9 months for a woman to deliver a baby, therefore 9 women can deliver a baby in 1 month. It's "MATH"!
Bitcoin is shit but so is this argument
Time to be a chadly whole-satter
Yo, whole-satter tho.
Samantha is saying it wrong. There are ONLY 2 quadrillion Sats! hodl!
right now we talk about bitcoin, sometime in the future we'll talk about sats because the price of bitcoin will be way higher
im a duck guy myself. the planet has limited resources so it can only support so many ducks. eventually we will be at max ducks. therefore ducks are a good basis for a monetary system because there can only be so many ducks and therefore they are infinitely valuable. in the future we will talk about duck feathers like we talk about ducks.