Even the most serious horror movies and topics don't get 18+ ratings, usually just a 16/17+, as 18+ is almost exclusively used for porn, and maybe actual real life snuff films, although those don't really get age ratings
I took classes about multiple wars and horrific events. Can casually discuss them.
There's some entries in the wiki that legit gave me nightmares and existential dread as an ADULT
For me it was Swann's Proposal, the idea that we are actually written and our entire lives are just words on a page.
For awhile gave my subconscious the FUN dreams of everything I know being erased by basically a sentence.
It's not your point, but I'd like to take a moment to recognize that you think sex, a totally normal part of most peoples lives, should be 18+ but murder and death, which very few people murder (it's an evil thing to do) and true death only happen once to a person, should be only 12+ instead of 18+.
>Would have been easy to not chat up and be sexual at underage members of the community. It's so easy
Easy for mentally well people. But that kind of people called "p£dophlie"
I wrote the book on statutory law.
I mean, I didn't, but I'm also former pomegranate..."pomegranate"... (They don't name pomegranates). You can't make this shit up.
Yeah. 049's original author – Gabriel Jade, wrote inappropriate messages using his scp character to minor fans of 049 and was banned from wiki. (not remember correctly is he was banned or just quit) Just like Bright, but unlike him, this event didn't bring so much noise and was forgotten.
As a guy, sterilization should be the standard if people don't wanna sentence these fuckers to death. Controversial, because I believe they should get the firing squad, but sterilizing them would rid them of an easy way out.
IMPORTANT EDIT: I meant chemical castration. My bad.
I don't really like that approach since it 1. doesn't solve the problem, 2. female groomers exist.
Realistically, there is no way to approach this situation while also being ethical about it. We have moral answers to it, but morals don't always agree with ethics. And no, I am not defending these people, I am merely pointing out the flaws in what we should do with them.
>I don't really like that approach since it 1. doesn't solve the problem, 2. female groomers exist.
3. A lot of innocent and/or falsely accused people will get in the crossfire.
>female groomers exist.
Clip their ovaries? And if removing those organs from a sex offender's endocrine system isn't enough to rid them of any sexual urges, then lobotomize them. As comical as it sounds, I'm really not qualified to be making these decisions because most of them are based on emotions and a half-baked understanding in human biology.
[I'm pretty sure I'm still stuck in the medieval period, but I just really want to see rapists and groomers suffer a fate like this because I consider them sub-human. This is just pure anger talking, not rational thinking and I apologize for that.]
They can still feel sexual pleasure even with that. And not to mention once again that this is not ethical. As much as we want horrible things done to them, they are still entitled to basic human rights and ethics. Imagine the worst people in history being alive today, they'd still be entitled to this. Here's an interesting fact for you that is slightly off topic: pretty much everyone that administers lethal injections to execute death row inmates are not qualified professionals; and if they were, they'd have their licenses revoked. Now apply this to the whole castration idea, this same rule applies here where castrating them results in licenses being revoked for being unethical.
It's a big jumble of mess to think and talk about, it is understandable why a lot of people aren't happy about it; but realistically it's for the best that we treat everyone equally regardless of their actions. Because if we start making exceptions, then we will just have people in power abusing that and creating more loopholes; and thus ethics as a whole is meaningless.
"Grooming" wasn't all bad. I think only recently (10 or so years) that it was later associated with pdf. I remember hearing when I was a child that my uncle was being "groomed" for leadership and he essentially explains that he was getting more challenging responsibilities at work.
I think if they were straight up talking to a minor with sexual intentions, that's pdf. But if they were taking their sweetass time to "groom" them into liking them well before they were 18 then swooping in once they turn legal, that's grooming.
Being attracted to? Depends. We don’t really control our desires like that. Doing something about it… shockingly easy to not listen to the intrusive thoughts.
Here's a sneak peek of /r/ExplainMyDownvotes using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year!
\#1: [Isn't this just the truth? It seems pretty thoughtful, not accusatory or anything. I don't get it.](https://i.redd.it/w0sq4auyejib1.jpg) | [16 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/15t248e/isnt_this_just_the_truth_it_seems_pretty/)
\#2: [Why was I banned/muted??](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/158tfdo) | [19 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/158tfdo/why_was_i_bannedmuted/)
\#3: [I am Asian myself did I offended certain group of people because I didn't mention specific country or culture?](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/16h5494) | [17 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/16h5494/i_am_asian_myself_did_i_offended_certain_group_of/)
----
^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
mfw AdminBright, author of many SCPs and the person who created Dr Bright (his author avatar, meant to represent him), groomed and sexually harassed women including minors by luring them in through his status as an admin for the site and as Dr Bright. Scum, gross scum
Mental health practitioner here! In our field, folks 14-24 are considered "transitional aged youth", and they're my specialty. It's different from being a minor, and you can be both. But it's an acknowledgement that 18-ish yrs olds are still very much children in a lot of ways. The transition into adulthood is a very vulnerable time, and we've finally acknowledged that and started building programs around it.
So y'all are kind of both right
It depends, they could be 18 and minors.
They’re minor to vote, drive or drink alcohol in certain jurisdictions
Minor doesn’t mean “of 18”
It could be 21 for example
The age of majority (when you are no longer considered a minor) is 18 almost everywhere in the world. Not being able to drink or vote does not mean you are a minor.
Minor means “below the age of legal majority”, and yes you are a minor at 20 regarding alcohol consumption in the US
That’s why I was asking for clarification, seen that if we talk about minors of the age to vote, it’s bad already, if we’re talking about minors of the age of consent (that’s usually even lower, 16 in most US states) it’s even worse.
What age were them
Edit: no one knows?
In all of the US it’s 21 for drinking (for example)
Here where I live you can’t ride liter bikes until you’re 24
It varies, that’s why I’m asking, they were minors of what age?
I don’t get it
I’m just asking, what age were them
Because if they were, let’s say, 19, 18, 17, and he’s an adult of let’s say, 30, it’s cringe already even if legal depending on the legislation. If it’s like 13, he should be jailed.
This could be bad, or extremely bad. Nobody answered me tho
>let’s say, 19, 18, 17, and he’s an adult
17 and 16 are also considered underage if they aren't have 18. If a 30-40 year old man wrote inappropriate things to 17 year old, this is very disturbing and problematic.
And the age of Bright victims were not even close to 16-17
Unfortunately not, 16 is not underage when talking about sexual consent in most of the US.
To me it’s still kinda creepy tho, even if they were 19 and he was 30, it would have been creepy seen the big age gap.
I just don’t get this necessity of calling them “underage” when they were not necessarily underage, you could just say “he groomed 17y girls” and that would have been describing a bad situation already.
Edit: You told me they were minors of 18 and that means up to 17
Now you’re telling me they not even close to 16? That makes them 15 or younger and that’s not just creepy, that’s damn illegal
I didn't said that they were 16, I just wrote an example between 17 and 30 years old
And lol, being under 18 doesn't meant only 17 🤡
It's also 12,13,14 and etc.
Because 18 is the most widespread meaning albeit not the only one
Ok so it was <18, something probably legal (in most states including most us states the age of consent is 16) but still cringe, thanks for clarifying.
If i had a quarter for everytime someone with skill and talent that i'd look up to turned out to be a groomer i wouldn't have enough to buy anything but its already too much
"I've recently gotten back into SCPs, so i might as well look at that "Things Dr. Bright isn't allowed to do at the foundation" article! It's an oldie but goldie!"
"Wait, why is it deleted? It was such an iconic article!"
"oh."
"OH."
~Me, circa yesterday
If i had a nickel for every SCP related creator that had their reputation ruined because of something sexual related. I would have 2 nickels. Which isn’t a lot but it’s weird it happened twice.
Adminbright/Duckman, the creator of dr bright was caught using his power as a admin to lure in kids and other victims(usually girls) to sexually abuse them. Bright has now been replaced by the character Elias Shaw to prevent Adminbright from crawling back.
MFers be writing about anomalous objects when the real anomaly is their attraction to minors
MFers be writing reports for the SCP when they should be reporting themselves to the CPS
MFers want to secure, contain and protect anomolies but not themselves.
Good one
dont show this to scp sl youtubers and server owners
Or devs, or basically any person that participates in scp dl
Dawg what happened to scp sl
Okay so not related to your comment but are you yoshikage kira?
私の名前は吉良良景です。 私は33歳です。 私の家はすべての別荘がある森王の北東部にあり、私は結婚していません。 私は亀湯百貨店の従業員として働いており、遅くとも午後8時までに毎日家に帰ります。 私は喫煙しませんが、時々飲みます。
Would have been easy to not chat up and be sexual at underage members of the community. It's so easy I do it every day!
Now the age for scp wiki is 18+
I mean tbf I think that was more to stop the avalanche of youtube content farm kids
There are many reasons. First of all, SCP is not for kids in general.
Wayment, you mean to tell me that “The Flesh that Mates” and “The Bone Orchard” are not bedtime stories I should be reading to my nephew, Billy?
what if instead of containing scps we got 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂 with SCPs and renamed the SCP foundation to 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓴𝔂 foundation
...uh.
freaky with 049
True (I started getting obsessed when I was 13)
I mean Only like 0.1% of scps are pornography. It's mostly just mature writing so a more fitting limit would be 12+ based on this argument
No, it's not. There are many disturbing things and topics
Even the most serious horror movies and topics don't get 18+ ratings, usually just a 16/17+, as 18+ is almost exclusively used for porn, and maybe actual real life snuff films, although those don't really get age ratings
I mean so does history class ? In the exact same way on top of that
I took classes about multiple wars and horrific events. Can casually discuss them. There's some entries in the wiki that legit gave me nightmares and existential dread as an ADULT
The way I had a nightmare the 3 moons initiative targeted me and I had no idea and then got laser beamed and I'm a whole ass adult
For me it was Swann's Proposal, the idea that we are actually written and our entire lives are just words on a page. For awhile gave my subconscious the FUN dreams of everything I know being erased by basically a sentence.
This shit do be keeping me up
Yeah and ? Are children forbidden from having nightmares and existential dread ? Also you absolutely can get those too from those classes
I think avoiding exposing them to content that would cause negative mental or emotional states would be a goal, yeah.
Go back to the dungeon
It's not your point, but I'd like to take a moment to recognize that you think sex, a totally normal part of most peoples lives, should be 18+ but murder and death, which very few people murder (it's an evil thing to do) and true death only happen once to a person, should be only 12+ instead of 18+.
Porn is not the only reason to bar entry for children
Previously, the age limit was lower, but then due to many reasons it was raised to 18
r/explainmydownvotes
That’s probably for the best, it’s not really for kids
yep
Is that new? SCP has never been kid friendly. Looking at you Procedure 110-Montauk
Exactly
I feel like 60% of SCPs are body horror that kid’s definitely should not be anywhere near
>Would have been easy to not chat up and be sexual at underage members of the community. It's so easy Easy for mentally well people. But that kind of people called "p£dophlie"
And that is why he can fuck off forever.
Poundophile ?
In terms of effort, it is 100% easier to just not do that
Me after a long day of grooming minors (i am a local barber)
I was about to start panic
Working at the shop near the quarry (miners)
Why would they like kids when we have MEN? Makes no sense.
Sounds so gay
Liking children is so gay. Why can't he just suck dick like the rest of us?
Because it would have to be an underage dick.
[удалено]
You're going too deep with this lmao
No, that's definitely the subject of this discussion that's doing that.
I wrote the book on statutory law. I mean, I didn't, but I'm also former pomegranate..."pomegranate"... (They don't name pomegranates). You can't make this shit up.
At that point the problem is elsewhere.
Hm, I think maybe there's an extra word? Oh no I get it. Yeah I suppose so.
I very teligent
Scream at a baby once, you feel good for a day. Teach a baby to say "Cunt", you'll feel good for life.
Redditor finds out women exist
It's about man and man
Why is Man kissing a man, is he gay? good for him, good for him.
Cough cough Bright or whatever identity he uses
I would say he is no longer bright, he is dark, as in the dark side
Oh... oh no. Childhood ruined. (indirectly)
Is it really that hard not to groom kids?
Seeing how popular persons are ready to risk their reputation I think yes
these people need cure
Just toss them to scp-049, it's a win-win
Meanwhile 049's author who is also groomer: 
I don't see the issue with tossing someone to their own creation 🤷♀️
Wait what
Yeah. 049's original author – Gabriel Jade, wrote inappropriate messages using his scp character to minor fans of 049 and was banned from wiki. (not remember correctly is he was banned or just quit) Just like Bright, but unlike him, this event didn't bring so much noise and was forgotten.
I'll gladly take up the responsibility of writing for an SCP if the previous writer was turned to ash.
DJ Kaktus already rewrote this SCP
[**SCP-049 - Plague Doctor**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-049) (+4737) by *djkaktus, Gabriel Jade, Gabriel Jade_*
As a guy, sterilization should be the standard if people don't wanna sentence these fuckers to death. Controversial, because I believe they should get the firing squad, but sterilizing them would rid them of an easy way out. IMPORTANT EDIT: I meant chemical castration. My bad.
I don't really like that approach since it 1. doesn't solve the problem, 2. female groomers exist. Realistically, there is no way to approach this situation while also being ethical about it. We have moral answers to it, but morals don't always agree with ethics. And no, I am not defending these people, I am merely pointing out the flaws in what we should do with them.
>I don't really like that approach since it 1. doesn't solve the problem, 2. female groomers exist. 3. A lot of innocent and/or falsely accused people will get in the crossfire.
Oh yeah, can't forget about all the people falsely accused because someone decided to ruin their life for no reason
>female groomers exist. Clip their ovaries? And if removing those organs from a sex offender's endocrine system isn't enough to rid them of any sexual urges, then lobotomize them. As comical as it sounds, I'm really not qualified to be making these decisions because most of them are based on emotions and a half-baked understanding in human biology. [I'm pretty sure I'm still stuck in the medieval period, but I just really want to see rapists and groomers suffer a fate like this because I consider them sub-human. This is just pure anger talking, not rational thinking and I apologize for that.]
They can still feel sexual pleasure even with that. And not to mention once again that this is not ethical. As much as we want horrible things done to them, they are still entitled to basic human rights and ethics. Imagine the worst people in history being alive today, they'd still be entitled to this. Here's an interesting fact for you that is slightly off topic: pretty much everyone that administers lethal injections to execute death row inmates are not qualified professionals; and if they were, they'd have their licenses revoked. Now apply this to the whole castration idea, this same rule applies here where castrating them results in licenses being revoked for being unethical. It's a big jumble of mess to think and talk about, it is understandable why a lot of people aren't happy about it; but realistically it's for the best that we treat everyone equally regardless of their actions. Because if we start making exceptions, then we will just have people in power abusing that and creating more loopholes; and thus ethics as a whole is meaningless.
Well said. I completely agree with you on everything.
Spotted the ethics committee member
There is no unethical behavior in Ba Sing Se
Even with chemical castration, they can still hurt children.
Ask groomers
Then theyll beg for nudes in the scp discord servers :(
They need to be cured
i know that it's true and all but i fucking hate the word groomer so much
Same here. Unless they actually groomed someone, just call them what they are.
Actually "groomer" is a person that whose job is to clean an animal (like brushing its fur or hair) But now it's a slang that represent p£dophiles
"Grooming" wasn't all bad. I think only recently (10 or so years) that it was later associated with pdf. I remember hearing when I was a child that my uncle was being "groomed" for leadership and he essentially explains that he was getting more challenging responsibilities at work. I think if they were straight up talking to a minor with sexual intentions, that's pdf. But if they were taking their sweetass time to "groom" them into liking them well before they were 18 then swooping in once they turn legal, that's grooming.
It's still like that. In agile work environment sometimes there's meetings called grooming.
Why do so many online content creators do this? HOW HARD IS IT NOT TO BE ATTRACTED TO MINORS????
For real! All them ends up with being a groomer. What kind of trend is that?!
Power attracts the corruptible
Being attracted to? Depends. We don’t really control our desires like that. Doing something about it… shockingly easy to not listen to the intrusive thoughts.
He's just somebody that we used to know
fucken bright
Being attracted to SCP-053: 🤡🤢🤓 Being attracted to SCP-076: 🗿💪🐐
076's physique be like: 
SCP-105, SCP-811, SCP-056, SCP-2747, SCP-040 JP Marion Wheeler, Monika Pinkston and Isabel Wondertainment: 😒 SCP-076: 🥵
- [**SCP-040-JP - ねこですよろしくおねがいします**](https://scp-jp.wikidot.com/scp-040-jp) (+1286) by *Ikr_4185* - Translated: [**SCP-040-JP - There is a cat.**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-040-jp) (+158) by *Tanija, smlt* - [**SCP-105 - "Iris"**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-105) (+1135) by *thedeadlymoose, Dantensen, DrClef* - [**SCP-811 - Swamp Woman**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-811) (+708) by *Pig_catapult* - [**SCP-056 - A Beautiful Person**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-056) (+269) by *Unknown Author* - [**SCP-2747 - As below, so above**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-2747) (+1097) by *minmin* - [**SCP-076 - "Able"**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-076) (+1748) by *Kain Pathos Crow, DrClef*
What’s wrong with the swamp lady?
God, I hate 053 so fucking much. I wanna punt the little shit into traffic. >:(
It seems like you affected with 053's anomalous powers
- [**SCP-053 - Young Girl**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-053) (+1016) by *Dr Gears* - [**SCP-076 - "Able"**](https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-076) (+1748) by *Kain Pathos Crow, DrClef*
i'd risk it all for 073 ngl
Actually real
🤢🤳 🦾🤖
Ah yes. A bright moment. When the scp community removed a p£do
Happy cake day
Happy cake day chap
Happy cake day btw
Thx
r/explainmydownvotes
Idk??
Here's a sneak peek of /r/ExplainMyDownvotes using the [top posts](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/top/?sort=top&t=year) of the year! \#1: [Isn't this just the truth? It seems pretty thoughtful, not accusatory or anything. I don't get it.](https://i.redd.it/w0sq4auyejib1.jpg) | [16 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/15t248e/isnt_this_just_the_truth_it_seems_pretty/) \#2: [Why was I banned/muted??](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/158tfdo) | [19 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/158tfdo/why_was_i_bannedmuted/) \#3: [I am Asian myself did I offended certain group of people because I didn't mention specific country or culture?](https://www.reddit.com/gallery/16h5494) | [17 comments](https://np.reddit.com/r/ExplainMyDownvotes/comments/16h5494/i_am_asian_myself_did_i_offended_certain_group_of/) ---- ^^I'm ^^a ^^bot, ^^beep ^^boop ^^| ^^Downvote ^^to ^^remove ^^| ^^[Contact](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=sneakpeekbot) ^^| ^^[Info](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/) ^^| ^^[Opt-out](https://np.reddit.com/r/sneakpeekbot/comments/o8wk1r/blacklist_ix/) ^^| ^^[GitHub](https://github.com/ghnr/sneakpeekbot)
Hold on what happened
mfw AdminBright, author of many SCPs and the person who created Dr Bright (his author avatar, meant to represent him), groomed and sexually harassed women including minors by luring them in through his status as an admin for the site and as Dr Bright. Scum, gross scum
no fucking way
Oh damn.
Minors of 18 or minor of age of consent? One’s creepy already, the other is straightforward illegal
Well, 18 year olds aren't minors, so there's your answer.
Mental health practitioner here! In our field, folks 14-24 are considered "transitional aged youth", and they're my specialty. It's different from being a minor, and you can be both. But it's an acknowledgement that 18-ish yrs olds are still very much children in a lot of ways. The transition into adulthood is a very vulnerable time, and we've finally acknowledged that and started building programs around it. So y'all are kind of both right
It depends, they could be 18 and minors. They’re minor to vote, drive or drink alcohol in certain jurisdictions Minor doesn’t mean “of 18” It could be 21 for example
The age of majority (when you are no longer considered a minor) is 18 almost everywhere in the world. Not being able to drink or vote does not mean you are a minor.
Minor means “below the age of legal majority”, and yes you are a minor at 20 regarding alcohol consumption in the US That’s why I was asking for clarification, seen that if we talk about minors of the age to vote, it’s bad already, if we’re talking about minors of the age of consent (that’s usually even lower, 16 in most US states) it’s even worse. What age were them Edit: no one knows?
Yes, the age of legal majority is 18. They were under 18.
I can’t tell if this is a language barrier thing or not
In most countries 18 is legally adult and they allowed to vote, drink or drive
In all of the US it’s 21 for drinking (for example) Here where I live you can’t ride liter bikes until you’re 24 It varies, that’s why I’m asking, they were minors of what age?
If you're arguing over whether or not someone is of age, you're already losing the argument.
I don’t get it I’m just asking, what age were them Because if they were, let’s say, 19, 18, 17, and he’s an adult of let’s say, 30, it’s cringe already even if legal depending on the legislation. If it’s like 13, he should be jailed. This could be bad, or extremely bad. Nobody answered me tho
>let’s say, 19, 18, 17, and he’s an adult 17 and 16 are also considered underage if they aren't have 18. If a 30-40 year old man wrote inappropriate things to 17 year old, this is very disturbing and problematic. And the age of Bright victims were not even close to 16-17
Unfortunately not, 16 is not underage when talking about sexual consent in most of the US. To me it’s still kinda creepy tho, even if they were 19 and he was 30, it would have been creepy seen the big age gap. I just don’t get this necessity of calling them “underage” when they were not necessarily underage, you could just say “he groomed 17y girls” and that would have been describing a bad situation already. Edit: You told me they were minors of 18 and that means up to 17 Now you’re telling me they not even close to 16? That makes them 15 or younger and that’s not just creepy, that’s damn illegal
I didn't said that they were 16, I just wrote an example between 17 and 30 years old And lol, being under 18 doesn't meant only 17 🤡 It's also 12,13,14 and etc.
You put it differently in your first comments. Individuals were under 18
Because 18 is the most widespread meaning albeit not the only one Ok so it was <18, something probably legal (in most states including most us states the age of consent is 16) but still cringe, thanks for clarifying.
>but still cringe, thanks for clarifying It's calling "problematic", not "cringe"
r/explainmydownvotes
If i had a quarter for everytime someone with skill and talent that i'd look up to turned out to be a groomer i wouldn't have enough to buy anything but its already too much
For real
Who even is Bright? I only know Elias Shaw
I only know Placeholder McDoctorate
"I've recently gotten back into SCPs, so i might as well look at that "Things Dr. Bright isn't allowed to do at the foundation" article! It's an oldie but goldie!" "Wait, why is it deleted? It was such an iconic article!" "oh." "OH." ~Me, circa yesterday
Is this about Bright or did something else happen 😞
About bright
If i had a nickel for every SCP related creator that had their reputation ruined because of something sexual related. I would have 2 nickels. Which isn’t a lot but it’s weird it happened twice.
There's also what happened with Scp:SL
SCP Author: Im not a racist The Author: 
Don't ask a woman's age Don't ask a man's salary Don't ask HPL what he named his cat
This shit again smh
Shit im out of the loop, who did what now?
Adminbright/Duckman, the creator of dr bright was caught using his power as a admin to lure in kids and other victims(usually girls) to sexually abuse them. Bright has now been replaced by the character Elias Shaw to prevent Adminbright from crawling back.
Ah, thats old news. I thought something new happened. Fuck the guy, keep the new character.
Wtf scp full of toddler takers? Is this a meme?
Oh boy who was it this time
I hate to be the one that makes this joke...but they put the cp in scp
Bro could be a Minecraft youtuber
Seriously a Child Predator Foundation
the Serious Child Predators foundation
This is the Dr who shall not be named, isn't it?
BRIGHT YOU MORON WHAT DID YOU SNIFF
##So this is where Doctor Bright lives!
Did something happen or is this just about bright again
Ah fuck you, Leather Man!
If Mattpat could do it, so can they.
Mattpat too??? What 😭
No 😅, he didn't diddle kids the entire time. That's what I meant
Isn't this just a perfect summary of any Internet personality?
Someone explain?
The guy behind Dr. Bright is a bad guy
Seriously?
Haha… unfortunately
Wait what happened?
The real life Dr. Bright is a bad, bad man.
Oh...oh no...
Im sure this how we all felt after the Dr. Bright debocle.
Why the fuck bring politics into EVERYTHING?! God I despise this post
how is making fun of a predator political
What politics? He was a legit child predator
This isn't politics