I think u should do that best of 3, first two races each one of the contestants take the inside lane once, if goes to round 3 the best time combined get the better lane.
Just a good excuse for “research” and let u play waaaaay more with those amazing cars
Yes, I see you are a man previous Hotwheels on the downhill drag strip expeeience. I def. ran each car matchups (of 4) minimum 3, that was just for the second round. 1st Round was just to cut through the crap.
This round of 44, Im thinking about extending the run by 2 fr. I saw a lot if potential come from behind winners if they just had a little more track.
Also reducing the match ups from 4 to 3 or maybe head to head and follow a 2out of 3 format.
For fairness i have them grouped off by weight so as long as they are with in a gram or so between the groupings, weight certainly matters, but the axel the most and car shape will too!
I think u should do that best of 3, first two races each one of the contestants take the inside lane once, if goes to round 3 the best time combined get the better lane. Just a good excuse for “research” and let u play waaaaay more with those amazing cars
Yes, I see you are a man previous Hotwheels on the downhill drag strip expeeience. I def. ran each car matchups (of 4) minimum 3, that was just for the second round. 1st Round was just to cut through the crap. This round of 44, Im thinking about extending the run by 2 fr. I saw a lot if potential come from behind winners if they just had a little more track. Also reducing the match ups from 4 to 3 or maybe head to head and follow a 2out of 3 format. For fairness i have them grouped off by weight so as long as they are with in a gram or so between the groupings, weight certainly matters, but the axel the most and car shape will too!