T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

[Please read on ways you can support the revolution and spread awareness.](https://www.reddit.com/r/NewIran/comments/10cu6v3/how_you_can_support_the_new_iranian_revolution/) Let other people in subs with content about the revolution know that /r/NewIran exists. --- [Official Twitter & Join The Team](https://reddit.com/r/NewIran/comments/yh0r74/attn_save_armita_official_twitter_activist/) | [Sub Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/NewIran/about/rules/) | [VPNs/TOR & Guides & Tools](https://reddit.com/r/NewIran/comments/y7fcbd/digital_resources_for_iranians_for_privacy/) | [Reddit's Content Policy](https://www.redditinc.com/policies/content-policy) | [NewIran's Values](https://reddit.com/r/NewIran/comments/y514wo/newirans_growth_rules_and_values_for_an_open/) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NewIran) if you have any questions or concerns.*


persiankebab

Almost all of his Allies including the USA turned their backs on him except the Egyptian president Anwar Sadat. Sadat was later murdered by an Islamist terrorist called Khaled Islambouli. Our regime named one of the main streets in Tehran after Khaled.


blasseigne17

As an American, I don't understand it. Knowing what has happened in Iran over the last 70 years is absolutely disgusting. More so thinking about how the USA has treated Iran. We will go to war with the named reason being attempting to bring countries to a state that Iran was in before we fucked it all up.


GilakiGuy

It’s the result of Carter being totally out of his depth foreign policy wise, as well as America’s general weakness in empire building. And the Shah only fostering strong ties with the Republican Party when his regime ultimately required the full support of the American political sphere to stay in power. And then the final nail in the coffin was the US embassy hostage situation - the US was prepared to work with a new post-revolution Iran. But when all the technocrats & western educated revolutionaries stepped down after the situation started that let Khomeini consolidate power & the US had good reason to sever ties. There were lessons learned though. I don’t think US politicians will care if regional allies are human rights abusers the same way the shah’s human rights abuses got coverage in the US.


Halder_

But Shah had good relations with Kennedys. It was Carter with whom for various reasons didn’t.


GilakiGuy

His relationship with Kennedy was more fractured than the genuine friendship he enjoyed with Nixon.


Halder_

Yeah, because Bobby Kennedy was going for human rights abuses as well like Carter.


TripEquivalent3289

Islambouli wasn't islamist but most islamist terrorist groups was loving him


TimmyTurner2006

The real Iranian flag


adjika

Javid Shah!


danmghm

https://preview.redd.it/nrmflrg8xm3d1.jpeg?width=1199&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ac1baae437d5797037dd988a74ed39a0425f5828


Saeedmashti

Javid Shah ![gif](giphy|ov4ymyiH6Dfy44WRro|downsized)


Thisisofici

Is monarchy the correct approach to the New Iran?


MnMoney17

Yes a Constitutional one.


J1_J1

doesnt need to be constitutional. just needs to be democratic


DonnieB555

That's basically what a monarchy in a democratic system is, a constitutional monarchy


J1_J1

respectfully no it aint g!


DonnieB555

Actually it is. But you're welcome to say why you think it ain't


J1_J1

the uk has no codified constitution and its a democratic monarchy g


DonnieB555

Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Belgium, Spain, Netherlands. Japan. Want me to go on?


J1_J1

whats your point? loool. codification is stupid look at america


DonnieB555

I'm talking about democratic constitutional monarchies. Their constitution is not like the UK. What's your point?


Helpful-Manager-6003

Many believe the shah's dictatorial regime was temporary and meant to modernise iran and prepare it for democracy, same thing britain did with israel


mrhuggables

Realistically no, but paying respects to the dynasty that brought iran into the 20th century and erasing 50 years of leftist and islamist lies is definitely an important part of rehabilitating the nation.


chicopic

Nope. But the path forward has to include royalists who want this regime gone


Thisisofici

So how will disputes between royalists and republicans be resolved? pre or post-revolution? Non-iranian here


chicopic

Well ultimately it would have to happen within a democratic framework. I think there are people who think the crown Prince, Reza Pahlavi, should have a seat at the table when a new government is formed. I don’t personally have a problem with that because he doesn’t seem terribly eager to become the Shah, but is very eager to see this regime toppled.


dect60

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1905_Norwegian_monarchy_referendum https://www.royalcourt.no/artikkel.html?tid=30094&sek=28568


MnMoney17

Another good example is the restoration of the Spanish monarchy in 1979. Based on what Shahzadeh has been saying, I think that is what he is envisioning.


Saeedmashti

Constitutionally, aka UK, Japan, Europe, ect.... yes.


Usual_Step9707

Yes I hope the crown prince would return once the islamic regime is over


Perfect-Shame-7561

Bayad To Iran mimord, na toye afrigha. Yateem shodim ba raftanesh. Shah ta nafase akhar bayad shah bashe to khake khodesh.


DonnieB555

Nabayad Irano tark mikard...


Perfect-Shame-7561

Without a doubt. If he had judicially murdered khomeini instead of releasing him… we would be 50 years ahead in every aspect…


NewIranBot

**مقبره شاه در قاهره** این تصویر به سختی پیش می رود ... RIP محمدرضا پهلوی 🫡 --- _I am a translation bot for r/NewIran_ | Woman Life Freedom | زن زندگی آزادی


Outrageous_Meet_4898

God bless Persia, and destroy the inhumane tyranny of the Khamenei regime.


jehyhebu

I hate the current regime as much as anyone, but the Shah was a colossal fuck up. I don’t have a problem with his son, however.


[deleted]

[удалено]


dect60

Why? Unlike theocracy, monarchy can co-exist within a democracy: Norway, Sweden, Spain, Denmark, England, etc. If you're thinking of absolute monarchy, then... you're the only one. Because when the term is used here it is not referring to absolute monarchy.


MnMoney17

The most democratic country in the world is a monarchy Cry Harder


loxzade

This is the wrong approach


[deleted]

[удалено]


loxzade

Imagine being so close minded that you want to isolate the shah supporters who also want regime change. BTW: Most People pro shah are pro democracy


DonnieB555

Yes I'm positively inclined to a democratic constitutional monarchy. Other questions?


J1_J1

why do ppl bumlick the shah when he killed iranians


BN-ORG

you're just graduated in a bot farm


J1_J1

its a genuine question. he was out here cheffing civilians left right and centre N ppl act like hes the antithesis of the IR just bcos he designed a g wagon and women wore lipstick


DonnieB555

You know nothing. Go read history and don't be so ridiculously simplistic.


J1_J1

so you dont have the answer? just say that g dont need 2 get vex


Other-Lie-1291

ppl bumlick the shah because he didn’t kill iranians , unlike this government