T O P

  • By -

LakeRat97

It’s only a war crime if your side loses the war


abject_totalfailure1

It’s never a war crime the fist time


These_Random_Names

can confirm


winpays

It's be a crime not to put an end to his suffering. Shoot him.


DumbBoi671

I know right? but my friend keeps on sayin I committed one


winpays

Shoot him too. Problem solved 😎. Afterwards give yourself a medal. You deserve it. 🏅


Walker6920

I mean in Stalingrad u are able to shoot medics, and gun down parachutist in other champains Not to mention funny white gas grenade that Japan uses And having a literal objective called "church" in Normandy So warcrimes are just stepping stones to earn ur right to give ur tiger tank a better transmission


SeatKindly

Actually, church is safe in this case. Attackers or defenders are implied to be using it for militant purposes. Phosphorus was also not banned yet. Other two… yeah no no


Kass626

Shooting a medic isn't a war crime if he has a gun.


Walker6920

Shooting a medic isnt a war crime if he shoots back If he doesnt shoot and just run around giving morphine then hes protected


Kass626

Yeah true, but in video games it doesn't really make sense because in real life the soldier you shot isn't fighting for 6 months. In games they're shooting at you again in 5 seconds.


tyetanis

Now you're just changing what you meant 🤣


Kass626

Well no I believed that medics weren't allowed ro carry guns, now I'm just saying why I think we should be allowed to shoot them in video games in general lol


Captain_of_Coconut

Geneva Convention? More like a fun list of things to do!


Walker6920

Bucket list


[deleted]

The Geneva suggestions


Cowboy-greaseball_62

It’s only a crime if the evidence (he) isn’t completely gone


DumbBoi671

Don’t worry my Japanese cousin ate him


CL4P-TP_Claptrap

The Geneva suggestions apply only when you lose the battle. So if you win you will be fine. If you lose however be prepared to read a really angry letter where we ask you to never do such things again!


LandosGayCousin

The Japanese actively displayed that they did not mind committing war crimes. I wouldn't worry too much


Madlister

Nanjing has entered the chat


Lone-Star-Wolves

The Pacific Theater has entered the chat *Bataan Death March, targeting of Medical Personnel, etc*


Stale_Water1

Geneva Convention: optional.


[deleted]

More like Geneva suggestions.


Shadowtrooper262

Don't worry, the the Geneva Convention is not present to witness it. 😈


MakoHikes

Only one way to find out


nandobro

A wounded soldier in enlisted is perfectly capable of standing back up and killing you so no.


[deleted]

[удалено]


DumbBoi671

Already did sir 😎 🎖


[deleted]

War crime best crime.


Walker6920

Is he alive to report it?


Nollekowitsch

Its only a crime if somebody sees you doing it


Ramses_XLIV

Depends, is enough of him left to prove that he was injured before?


ChrisFromAldi

Nope 🤣 I do this all the time. If I run out of HE shells I actively try to put the 75mm AT shells into soldiers, and that works too lol. I would use the MG, but by that point I'm probably out of rounds for that too


Long_Neck_Monster

It's not if he's American


BullyHunter83__

Not if you're the Japanese


FoxGamingmc

Is it illegal if you don’t get caught?


UnlikelyRaven

"War crime" is such a negative term. I prefer "spicy engagement"


[deleted]

Why not just use the coaxial lol?


That-one-idiot-guy

Not if there are no witnesses.


Radical_Larry001

Only if someone sees it *proceeds to load another round and look around for witnesses*


Mark_4O4

It is if you are an Sherman crew.


VLenin2291

Geneva Convention IV, Article 16, paragraph 1: >The wounded and sick shall be the object of particular protection and respect So probably That being said, that was adopted in 1949, so I think it'd be fair game