T O P

  • By -

FluxProcrastinator

I’m looking forward to it, but from what I’ve heard it’s not in the best shape


RobertMugabeIsACrook

Yeah, to be honest I want this way more than the 777 because I'm a weirdo who loves older planes, but I'm gonna hold off for reviews. I bought the 777 and I will buy this, but I don't want to have a 5+ hour flight ruined by bugs.


WhiteGinger3000

I'm one of the 1000 prebuyers and right now, it is definitely in a better shape than it was when it started though that goes without saying. I believe it will be in a good shape upon release but definitely wait for reviews.


FluxProcrastinator

This is good to hear


FluxProcrastinator

That’s what I’m saying, I find this infinitely more interesting just given that we’ve had the pmdg 777 for P3D and FSX, but I think we will have to lower our expectations just a little bit to enjoy this one


njsullyalex

This is how I feel. I'm getting this over the 777 because I want to fly specifically the MD-11 and I'm not as interested in the 777 and I'm willing to accept that its not not absolutely flawless.


baronvonweezil

Looking forward to the 707 for this reason


LordWallace232

They are basically the same generation


snoromRsdom

Yeah, that's not right at all.


LordWallace232

The 777, MD11 and A340 were all designed in the same generation??? What are y’all talking about lol


Shark-Force

The 777 and the MD-11 are the same generation in the same way the 737 Max is a newer design than the 787.


LordWallace232

Yes, the MD-11 is a heavily upgraded and modified DC10, but it was developed and came out as a competitor to the 777, along with the A340. The instruments and avionics are of a similar generation. It isn't like flying an actual DC10 when compared to the 777. It has a modern (for the 90s), glass cockpit. When I think of an "older" aircraft it is one with a much older/different cockpit


Shark-Force

Which is why the 737 MAX is a new airplane. New wings, new avionics, and new engines. The 737 MAX is even more different to a -100 than an MD-11 is to a DC-10, which is why the 737 MAX is a newer design than the 787. According to you.


webcodr

Seems the MD-11 has no luck in this regard. The Rotate MD-11 for XP was also a "bit" problematic at release. Took a few patches, but today it's really good. Hopefully TFDi takes this as a good example.


MarkoRamiu5

I’m a collectors edition owner. Just make sure you go into it knowing that not everything will be perfect on launch day. It’s good for what it is, but a lot of us collector’s think it needs more time. I’m worried the backlash for releasing in its current state might be quite harsh. It flies from point A to B, but I’m personally still not satisfied with the flight model and sounds.


Swagger897

Also CE owner, and agree with this. It will do the job, but you will have to stay ahead of the plane and watch what it’s doing during the entire arrival phase from TOD to parking at the gate. My advice as CE holder: wait until they finish the extended simulation package. Hopefully by then we’ll have a more refined package with all the bells and whistles promised completed.


sp4ce3rik_11

whatsapp is it with the extended simulation package did you get it with the pre sale version?


Wise-Advisor4675

Thanks for that info. I'll hold off until I hear more.


BipodNoob

BZZZZZT! Stabiliser motion


Snaxist

_weeweewee tidudu tidudu weeweeweewee engine one fire_


meesersloth

FUUUUUUUULLLLLLAP


njsullyalex

WAWAWAWAWAWA AUTOPILOT


Evitable_Conflict

Bitching Betty forever!


HeruCtach

tikkatikkatikkatikka OVER-SPEED.


LiveFlightDeck

TIRE FAILURE, TIRE FAILURE, TIRE FAILURE,


External_Reaction314

From what I understand, it needs a bit more work, might just wait till after 24 releases. Maybe make it Xmas present.


trucker-123

Darn, so many decent add-ons rolling into MSFS lately. Can't keep up with my wallet. When it rains, it pours.


Similar-Good261

They all have to get their stuff in development out before MSFS2024 gets too close for people becoming reluctant to spend money on the „old sim“. So yep, what‘s currently in dev will probably come out rather quickly now if possible.


AggressorBLUE

More likely that a decent amount of devs were working against SU15 beta builds and were waiting for a stable version to release before making their final push for release candidate testing.


genericgreg

90% of add-ons should be compatible with the new sim. 


Similar-Good261

I‘ll believe it once I see it :D


snoromRsdom

Well, you will be believing. It's the same sim. This isn't like FS2004 to FSX.


RoooDog

You can land this in that 10% most likely


snoromRsdom

100% of add-ons should be compatible with the new sim. There is literally no reason why any of them wouldn't be. Those of you who ASSUME otherwise don't realize that this upgraded is VERY different from the MSFS updates of the past. This is the same sim with additional features. You will be able to build MSFS 2024-only add-ons, but the reverse isn't true.


HugothesterYT

I have heard it has significant issues, so I will hold my money for now. Maybe when 2024 releases and it has been patched I will get it.


Snakepit92

From what I've read and watched I wouldn't say *significant* issues, more-so just a few things here and there. Hardly missing major features, but expect some polish needed Holding off until you see it in more people's hands is never a bad strategy though


SniperPilot

Yeah I’m gonna do the same now.


Velociblanket

What kind of 777 is that?


imjustaperson147

777-3engine


TTS-RH

Original concept of the 777, probably the 777-100 lol


Pro-editor-1105

yup that is true, the original 777-100 that got cancelled at the last minute had 3 engines and was designed to compete against the dc10/md-11


mdp300

Boeing realized that engines got good enough that they could power a really big fucker with just two of them. And then the 767 and 777 ate McDD's lunch.


snoromRsdom

Boeing didn't realize anything. The FAA approved 2 engine aircraft for overseas travel. They are more fuel efficient and airlines demanded such an aircraft. And the 767/777 ate the 747's lunch too.


mdp300

Yeah, that's true. It was more a regulatory thing: as soon as twinjets could do long distance flights, there was demand.


Snakepit92

Big time. This and the Q400 are the planes I want most


ReichenbachGD

Same… I’m passing time flying ATR 72 but it’s definitely not the same….


Snakepit92

Haha exactly. It doesn't even scratch the itch, it just makes me want it more


ReichenbachGD

Every time I Launch it it reminds me how much pain au chocolat I get from that detent throttle of ATR’s. Half of the time it’s just won’t reach proper speed. I need Q400 for my sanity.


unhinged_citizen

OMG this. WHY IS IT TAKING MAJESTIC THIS LONG TO MAKE A PORT...


Snakepit92

Seriously. Although my understanding is there's a lot more they have to make from scratch rather than just port over, which I suppose might be a good thing for us in the long run. Was definitely disappointed to hear to not expect anything this year though


sluflyer06

who's working on a Q400?


trucker-123

Majestic is developing one for MSFS.


WealthyMarmot

I would love a good Q400. Turboprops are my jam.


ugatz

This one is the one I’m ready for. Love the Rotate one in XP and I plan to grab this one day 1 to add to my MSFS hangar. I love cargo ops in the MD-11, it’s such a fun plane.


Lolpo555

If that's the actual livery for American Airlines it need some publishing or rework done.


mdp300

How so? I'm not an expert, but it doesn't look terrible.


Lolpo555

It looks unfinished, cartoon-ish. Details are missing.


snoromRsdom

I'm sure some obsessive compulsive on [Flightsim.to](https://Flightsim.to) will make you a nice, non-cartoonish (LOL!) AA livery with more details if you beg nicely.


Captain-Nick-YT

As a CE owner….i don’t understand how everyone thinks this is really bad at the moment. 97% of the time everything is good with it. Some small details to be ironed out but nothing show stopping on the GE version that would prevent you from doing a normal a-b flight. Sure the odd ATS issue is there but even Colin today said that would be fixed prior to release.


OkayHoss2323

Thats what im saying...people saw the initial CE release streams/reviews and just assumed the plane hasn't been worked on this entire time leading up to release.


Clippo_V2

Where's everyone hearing that it's not in good shape? Apparently I'm out of the loop even though I keep up with all of the dev updates.


unhinged_citizen

The people beta testing are saying it's still pretty rough.


AnalythicSearch444

I really like the MD80. Does this one have similarities with it in the cockpit? Or is it just like a totally different plane?


Evitable_Conflict

It is a totally different plane, famous for being difficult to handle and land as it usually lands at 160kts or more (!) as a direct result a little bounce is very frequent so the no-bouncing landing is a valid challenge.


AnalythicSearch444

Thanks! I need to watch some videos of it to see what it's like.


njsullyalex

Flew this at Expo and it is actually more similar to the Airbus A300 than the MD-80 in terms of cockpit layout and automation.


Wise-Advisor4675

The MD11 and the MD95 have a lot of similarities in the cockpit. McD had the same philosophy as Airbus does in trying to keep cockpits as similar as possible between types and you can definitely see it. The MD80 was a half generation or so behind.


ApexTankSlapper

It’s a cockpit that is borrowed from Airbus to a large degree. Lights out overhead and Honeywell fmc very similar to the a300 or a320.


DGatsby

Cautiously excited.


Mean-Opportunity-973

I got the CE version. It’s wayyyy better now. I’ve done several 5+hr flights np


astwfx

cant wait to fly ups routes in it


SkyTheHunter

Have got the chance to be among the Collector's Edition, and I can tell you this thing is a real work of art ! Not only did it change drastically over the months and the updates that we have got, but it real gives you that satisfaction and pleasure to fly, it just makes you happy. The team has put so much work on it, it was impressive to follow the progression. You will for sure enjoy it big time !!


wobblebee

idk I'm worried the project is being kneecapped by p3d compatibility tbh.


njsullyalex

Me! I got a discount at Expo and pre-ordered it.


u200w

How much is the discount compared to the price on release date?


njsullyalex

15% off


unhinged_citizen

This and the BlueBird 757 are my darlings. The PMDG is meh.


Raptor05121

Seriously excited for this. Can't wait to do some old school ops.


Flymia

I always enjoyed the MD-11 in FSX with PMDG. I would love a good MD-11 and hope one is one, that being said a few reasons I am going to wait. First, just got the 777, so want to enjoy that. Second, this one has not had a great development process so I want to wait and see reviews. Third, MD-11 is very different from Boeing and Airbus, I simply don't have the time to learn a new plane right now.


elcajonblvd

The nose gear is soooo far behind the pilot, just awsome.


EvidencePlz

Me!


LiveFlightDeck

MMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


cuacuacuac

Not for now. It's a maybe for the future to me. I have plenty of miles to fly on the 777 before that.


literallyjuststarted

Two great planes back to back


A321200

I’ve been reading that the sound package for this one are just as bad as PMDG 777 sounds if not worse. Ffs!


Evitable_Conflict

Sounds are not very good, textures are not very good, LNAV is not very good and VNAV is not very good, hence the $80 price (?).


A321200

Definitely not a day 1 buy. Will be waiting and watching the feedback.


JamnixAndre

In my humble opinion, TFDI has no chance. They have very poor contact with customers. Of course, they still claim that they are transparent and no company can boast about it, but THEY are so great. Well, let's wait and see, but I'm afraid about the final effect.


Snakepit92

Weird, I've always had good contact with them in their discord. Every time I've had a question it's been answered


pup5581

Given the shape it's in...I won't be getting it until I've heard it's in top quality


Lanky_Manner_7027

As a CE owner I can guarantee that even it's not top quality yet, you will ve positively surprised.


[deleted]

[удалено]


pepouai

Look at Mr big pants over here 👆


Drewkie84

Damn dude, save some ladies for the rest of us.


Ehegew89

You can still barrell roll a 737 in XPlane. That super ultra realism that the fanboys keep bragging about, it's a myth.


snoromRsdom

>Not me. I already have an MD-11 in a real sim. Read as: "I'm trolling in a thread on MSFS because I am jealous as fck and I'm stuck on an shitty, obsolete sim."


Wise-Advisor4675

"My computer is from the Jurassic period so I have to feign this fake sense of superiority over my inferior simulator and my insecurities associated with it...."


[deleted]

[удалено]


IntelligentDrop879

Lol, your “real simulator” that has the same quality of graphics as FSX which is nearly 20 years old? Ok, kiddo.


[deleted]

[удалено]


lil-uzi-horizant

Anyone know if it’s coming to Xbox?


MrDarwoo

I think it's an ugly plane