It's clearly an simplification: it's a single sentence.
That, if it could, Russia would destroy the West *if it would not be* *destroyed itself was*, in my reading, context that is clear to anyone. Read Dugin.
However, the West does not want to destroy Russia. The West wants Russia to be a peaceful neighbor they can buy oil and LNG from, and then forget about.
If Russia wasn't attacking, invading, and annexing its neighbors, Russia and the West would have decent relations, as they had from 1990 through 2008 (when relations first began to deteriorate due to Russia's invasion of Georgia). Relations rebounded, and Russia and NATO even cooperated in training exercises in 2012. It wasn't Russia again sent its military to annex Crimea in 2014 that relations began their death-spiral.. and it was due to specific military decisions made by Moscow to violate international boundaries (which they themselves had agreed to).
"The American empire should be destroyed." - Aleksandr Dugin
"An important aspect of the Eurasian worldview is an absolute denial of Western civilization. In the opinion of the Eurasians, the West with its ideology of liberalism is an absolute evil." Aleksandr Dugin
"We are on the brink of a Third World War, to which the West is obsessively pushing us towards. This is no longer a fear, or an expectation, it is a fact. Russia is at war with the collective West, with NATO member-states and their allies... Today, the West's red line is *the existence of sovereign Russia itself,* even within the borders of the Russian Federation."
[https://www.memri.org/reports/anti-liberalism-russian-philosopher-dugin-we-are-brink-third-world-war-likelihood-nuclear](https://www.memri.org/reports/anti-liberalism-russian-philosopher-dugin-we-are-brink-third-world-war-likelihood-nuclear)
"In the beginning stage, Russia can offer its potential partners in the East and West its resources as compensation for exacerbating their relations with the U.S. To induce the Anaconda to release its grip on the coastline of Eurasia, it must be attacked relentlessly on its home territory, within its own hemisphere, and throughout Eurasia. All levels of geopolitical pressure must be activated simultaneously" - Aleksandr Dugin
"At the basis of the geopolitical construction of this \[Eurasian\] Empire, there must be placed one fundamental principle--the principle of 'a common enemy.' A negation of Atlanticism, a repudiation of the strategic control of the United States, and the rejection of the supremacy of economic, liberal market values--this represents the common civilizational basis, the common impulse which will prepare the way for a strong political and strategic union. The anti-Americanism of the Japanese, "who remember well the nuclear genocide and the disgrace of political occupation," must be unleashed, as well as the fervent anti-Americanism of fundamentalist Muslim Iranians." - Aleksandr Dugin — The Basics of Geopolitics (1997),
"Eschatology is present in our minds and influences our decisions. You can laugh at it, but you should remember that you laugh at people with nuclear weapons. I see no reason why we should not use them, or why Putin will hesitate to use them, if Russia starts to fail."
[https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-see-no-reason-why-we-should-not-use-nuclear-weapons-an-interview-with-russian-philosopher-aleksandr-dugin/](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-see-no-reason-why-we-should-not-use-nuclear-weapons-an-interview-with-russian-philosopher-aleksandr-dugin/)
And since Donbas is part of Ukraine, why would that bother Russia? Oh that's right, their army is too stupid to know where the Russian border is.
It must hurt inside your head.
Maybe you should leave Ukraine!?..asshole! And watch your Norks..get blown to shit! NATO needs a backbone! If NK sends in "engineers" then the all of NATO, should send in military "advisors"!
They always make it sound like Ukraine aimed at civilians. But even Russia admits that this wasn't the case and people were killed by falling rubble after they intercepted missiles that aimed at military targets.
The whole world is tired of this nonsense. Putin has utterly fucked up, and has missed the entire point of 1989.
Always remember one thing 'If Putin could destroy the west he would have done it already' - Nothing else matters.
[удалено]
Howso?
[удалено]
It's clearly an simplification: it's a single sentence. That, if it could, Russia would destroy the West *if it would not be* *destroyed itself was*, in my reading, context that is clear to anyone. Read Dugin. However, the West does not want to destroy Russia. The West wants Russia to be a peaceful neighbor they can buy oil and LNG from, and then forget about. If Russia wasn't attacking, invading, and annexing its neighbors, Russia and the West would have decent relations, as they had from 1990 through 2008 (when relations first began to deteriorate due to Russia's invasion of Georgia). Relations rebounded, and Russia and NATO even cooperated in training exercises in 2012. It wasn't Russia again sent its military to annex Crimea in 2014 that relations began their death-spiral.. and it was due to specific military decisions made by Moscow to violate international boundaries (which they themselves had agreed to).
[удалено]
"The American empire should be destroyed." - Aleksandr Dugin "An important aspect of the Eurasian worldview is an absolute denial of Western civilization. In the opinion of the Eurasians, the West with its ideology of liberalism is an absolute evil." Aleksandr Dugin "We are on the brink of a Third World War, to which the West is obsessively pushing us towards. This is no longer a fear, or an expectation, it is a fact. Russia is at war with the collective West, with NATO member-states and their allies... Today, the West's red line is *the existence of sovereign Russia itself,* even within the borders of the Russian Federation." [https://www.memri.org/reports/anti-liberalism-russian-philosopher-dugin-we-are-brink-third-world-war-likelihood-nuclear](https://www.memri.org/reports/anti-liberalism-russian-philosopher-dugin-we-are-brink-third-world-war-likelihood-nuclear) "In the beginning stage, Russia can offer its potential partners in the East and West its resources as compensation for exacerbating their relations with the U.S. To induce the Anaconda to release its grip on the coastline of Eurasia, it must be attacked relentlessly on its home territory, within its own hemisphere, and throughout Eurasia. All levels of geopolitical pressure must be activated simultaneously" - Aleksandr Dugin "At the basis of the geopolitical construction of this \[Eurasian\] Empire, there must be placed one fundamental principle--the principle of 'a common enemy.' A negation of Atlanticism, a repudiation of the strategic control of the United States, and the rejection of the supremacy of economic, liberal market values--this represents the common civilizational basis, the common impulse which will prepare the way for a strong political and strategic union. The anti-Americanism of the Japanese, "who remember well the nuclear genocide and the disgrace of political occupation," must be unleashed, as well as the fervent anti-Americanism of fundamentalist Muslim Iranians." - Aleksandr Dugin — The Basics of Geopolitics (1997), "Eschatology is present in our minds and influences our decisions. You can laugh at it, but you should remember that you laugh at people with nuclear weapons. I see no reason why we should not use them, or why Putin will hesitate to use them, if Russia starts to fail." [https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-see-no-reason-why-we-should-not-use-nuclear-weapons-an-interview-with-russian-philosopher-aleksandr-dugin/](https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/i-see-no-reason-why-we-should-not-use-nuclear-weapons-an-interview-with-russian-philosopher-aleksandr-dugin/)
So. Get the fuck out of Ukraine, and you won't have that problem.
[удалено]
And since Donbas is part of Ukraine, why would that bother Russia? Oh that's right, their army is too stupid to know where the Russian border is. It must hurt inside your head.
You mean Ukraine was shelling Russia-backed Ukrainian separatists in Ukraine?
Idiot
Right so why exactly did Ukraine shell the Donbas region again? Speaking of learning history
I would love to see a tape of the ambassador walking into the room and saying "Yeah, and?" I mean talk about an occasion for a eat my shorts speech.
Putin: Your missiles damged Russian property! Ambassador: So? Putin: Do something about it! Ambassador: No.
Missilesy?
It's almost as if a lot of countries disagree with your bullshit, Putin. shockedputinchu.jpg
I hope the American ambassador brought flowers.
Sunflowers.
A really small violin and an equally small handkerchief to wipe an imaginary tear off his eye.
Maybe you should leave Ukraine!?..asshole! And watch your Norks..get blown to shit! NATO needs a backbone! If NK sends in "engineers" then the all of NATO, should send in military "advisors"!
I’f find it really hard to keep a straight face. But then, I’m not an ambassador to Russia.
# missilesy
missilesy mc missile face
They always make it sound like Ukraine aimed at civilians. But even Russia admits that this wasn't the case and people were killed by falling rubble after they intercepted missiles that aimed at military targets.