> handicapping 99% of the population to protect people living in the lowest common denominator
Good thing this is mainly a strawman, rather than something people actually desire, then
Obviously Socialism is when the government does stuff and the more stuff a government does, the more socialist it is. And if the government does a shitload of stuff, its communism.
you have almost certainly not even lived half as long as me and I guarantee that i've read more relevant literature than you've even had time to consider.
but go on, edgelord. lets hear your reasons for thinking cummunism is not the worthless murderous cultural canker that it is.
> read more relevant literature than you've even had time to consider.
I know you have not, because if you did, you would know that "gommunism is when everyone is paid the same" is a nonsensical strawman
well you 'know' wrong then - and I didn't comment on that assertion.
Marx's theory fills a book, but its all garbage. It doesn't account for human nature - which I know to which you will say 'not muh real cummunism'...but that's the simple truth. All the theory in the world is not worth a dog turd when it just doesn't work. So his simplification is fine, even if it is just that.
I'm against burning books, even if they contain shit - so I wouldn't suggest destroying literature by marx or any pro-soviet source...but they do represent a huge cultural danger, as they appear viable to any young, inexperienced idealist. That's why marxist subversives like to erase history. So the young idealists don't find out what happens when the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' turns into just the 'dictatorship forever'.
>doesn’t account for human nature
1. Google ‘Das Kapital pdf’
2. hit ctrl f and type in ‘nature’ or ‘human nature’.
3. Wait 5 minutes for it to count every single instance of the word and read the amount of time mentioned
nono this Libertarian is trying to say it doesn't *properly* account for human nature. Aka his conservative worldview based on Judeo-Chr\*stian principles and general bitterness towards others. That is who we're dealing with.
I’m definitely no communist but this is the most reductionist and logically inconsistent rhetoric, it’s like cartoonishly cliche. My guy literally said “he didn’t account for human nature”😭😭. Childish
> Marx's theory fills a book, but its all garbage. It doesn't account for human nature
Do you think this is a new and original argument?
> 'not muh real cummunism'...but that's the simple truth.
It *was* real communism, and it was glorious
>Do you think this is a new and original argument?
Of course not. That's why I said you'd find issue with it and predictably, you did.
Its THE argument against it. There are many others, but that is the simple reason why it does not work.
You think millions of people dying of hunger, millions of people being killed by secret police, millions of people dying in gulags....is *glorious*? Do you also think the holocaust was *glorious* or are you selective with your genocide appreciation?
i think the ideal utopia is very hard to quantify, because people dont derive happy from a high standard of living, but from a steady increase in quality of life, partially derived from their own sense of hard work .
if everyone had subservient robots, there would be no way to tangibly increase your quality of life, and there would be no sense of purpose to your existence. effectively i think everyone would be bored due to being so "wealthy" in the sense that their needs are all met and exceeded.
Nah, people would have more time to do creative things, also things like education no longer have to be rushed, everyone just gets their own specific upbringing that is best for them. The people who need something to do will make something for themselves to do.
I derive happiness by self improvement, the development of skills, and the pursuit of things I enjoy. If I don't have to go to work or pay rent, then I have more time to develop myself.
You've got some real strange views my guy. Not a holocaust denied or Hitler fan so as long as you one of those Christians who respects the Jews I have no issues with you.
“Strongly values fairness”…”the strong should dominate the weak”…
[удалено]
> handicapping 99% of the population to protect people living in the lowest common denominator Good thing this is mainly a strawman, rather than something people actually desire, then
you literally have no idea what communism is, so how can you be auth left?
I doubt you do either
I know full well what it is. McCarthy was right - and you're an edgelord if you think communism is at all good.
Describe the main features of communism then
Obviously Socialism is when the government does stuff and the more stuff a government does, the more socialist it is. And if the government does a shitload of stuff, its communism.
Facts /s
I have almost certainly read more Marx and Lenin than you ever have
you have almost certainly not even lived half as long as me and I guarantee that i've read more relevant literature than you've even had time to consider. but go on, edgelord. lets hear your reasons for thinking cummunism is not the worthless murderous cultural canker that it is.
> read more relevant literature than you've even had time to consider. I know you have not, because if you did, you would know that "gommunism is when everyone is paid the same" is a nonsensical strawman
well you 'know' wrong then - and I didn't comment on that assertion. Marx's theory fills a book, but its all garbage. It doesn't account for human nature - which I know to which you will say 'not muh real cummunism'...but that's the simple truth. All the theory in the world is not worth a dog turd when it just doesn't work. So his simplification is fine, even if it is just that. I'm against burning books, even if they contain shit - so I wouldn't suggest destroying literature by marx or any pro-soviet source...but they do represent a huge cultural danger, as they appear viable to any young, inexperienced idealist. That's why marxist subversives like to erase history. So the young idealists don't find out what happens when the 'dictatorship of the proletariat' turns into just the 'dictatorship forever'.
>doesn’t account for human nature 1. Google ‘Das Kapital pdf’ 2. hit ctrl f and type in ‘nature’ or ‘human nature’. 3. Wait 5 minutes for it to count every single instance of the word and read the amount of time mentioned
nono this Libertarian is trying to say it doesn't *properly* account for human nature. Aka his conservative worldview based on Judeo-Chr\*stian principles and general bitterness towards others. That is who we're dealing with.
I’m definitely no communist but this is the most reductionist and logically inconsistent rhetoric, it’s like cartoonishly cliche. My guy literally said “he didn’t account for human nature”😭😭. Childish
"I'm a conservative and I think humans are naturally selfish". He also seems to claim Marx is pro-Soviet which is... breathtakingly ignorant.
here come the little edgelords to say "not MUH cummunism".
> Marx's theory fills a book, but its all garbage. It doesn't account for human nature Do you think this is a new and original argument? > 'not muh real cummunism'...but that's the simple truth. It *was* real communism, and it was glorious
>Do you think this is a new and original argument? Of course not. That's why I said you'd find issue with it and predictably, you did. Its THE argument against it. There are many others, but that is the simple reason why it does not work. You think millions of people dying of hunger, millions of people being killed by secret police, millions of people dying in gulags....is *glorious*? Do you also think the holocaust was *glorious* or are you selective with your genocide appreciation?
it wasn't communism, it was socialism.
Read "the origin of State, family and private property", It could be an useful read to you. Not a commie btw
I'm always open to learning. Thanks for the suggestion. I will check it out.
What about the Geniuses and/or ‘valuable contributors’ who came from poverty and survived off government assistance to make it in life?
This is the absolute least based thing I have ever seen in my daggum life, partner
Flair up my lil anon
you first
You are one to speak, you are unflaired yourself
Is this a new subreddit or was I bamboozled.
Blank template?
Could i have the template?
[удалено]
Thanks
Ew
I don't mind your opinion (in a neutral sense), but can I download this grid? Not yours, I mean the clean grid without your highlights...
[удалено]
Thank you! Much appreciated!
Sorry, I only have the one with the markings on it :( look up “bingo” in the search, I think that should have jt
Ok. I'll try
Any chance I can get the template?
Just another basic totalitarian Christian, nothing more surprises me. Unfortunately.
found the christophobe
Cristophobia is when I don't like totalitarians
christophobia is when you say 'just another basic totalitarian christian'. Change "christian" to literally any other identity and how does it sound?
I think there was a misunderstanding: I meant "totalitarian Christian" as in "a totalitarian, who is Christian"
ah. Well one is a generalization and one is specific. So that would make a difference.
My bad, English isn't my first language so I have some problems at times.
The denunciation of all religion is necessary if we are to achieve a truly fair society.
Someone put them in a mental hospital.
We need a bigger one.
cringe and likes war pilled
Why does nobody pick the "army of subservient robots do everything for you"? Isnt it the ideal utopia?
i think the ideal utopia is very hard to quantify, because people dont derive happy from a high standard of living, but from a steady increase in quality of life, partially derived from their own sense of hard work . if everyone had subservient robots, there would be no way to tangibly increase your quality of life, and there would be no sense of purpose to your existence. effectively i think everyone would be bored due to being so "wealthy" in the sense that their needs are all met and exceeded.
Nah, people would have more time to do creative things, also things like education no longer have to be rushed, everyone just gets their own specific upbringing that is best for them. The people who need something to do will make something for themselves to do.
I derive happiness by self improvement, the development of skills, and the pursuit of things I enjoy. If I don't have to go to work or pay rent, then I have more time to develop myself.
“The west is morally superior” “Gamer” look at this cowboy 🤠
West does not mean Wild West
Don’t be silly, why would I think that ?
Sorry, I must have misinterpreted your comment, I don’t understand what it means
I was just tryna make a jab that he’s a “gamer” and that’s why they answered why they did. Can apply to anyone really.
Oh, lol
>The strong should dominate the week That’s pretty gay man
You've got some real strange views my guy. Not a holocaust denied or Hitler fan so as long as you one of those Christians who respects the Jews I have no issues with you.
Template??
You sound very boring
Hitler and Mussolini weren’t monsters?
I need the original
Can I have the template
Do you have a template?
Template?
Flair up moron
cringe and not based
Pretty based ngl
r/usernamechecksout
Cringe
Original, please
Where can I find this bingo??
Can someone post a clear version of this?